🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.