🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include lowering the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for various offences “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and harvest that and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, adding that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.